Calls grow for House of Lords to strengthen UK Environment Bill

13.09.2021

Government proposals to end UK role in driving deforestation overseas must be beefed up for benefits to be realised

The UK Government has proposed a legal framework to tackle the UK's contribution to global deforestation. That proposal, on the “Use of Forest Risk Commodities in Commercial Activity", is set out in Schedule 17 of the Environment Bill, which will be debated in the House of Lords on Wednesday 15 September 2021.

Schedule 17 represents a crucial opportunity to decouple UK consumption from deforestation – a major global sustainability challenge. The approach that the UK will take has particular importance given the package of legislative proposals currently before the Brazilian Congress. 

Those proposals, supported by the Brazilian Government, seek to legalise millions of hectares of deforestation and legalise, including retrospectively, violations of the rights of Indigenous Peoples. If adopted, those reforms could spell the end of the Amazon rainforest and render the UK Government’s new law effectively meaningless in terms of deforestation in Brazil – unless it is improved.

It is hoped the bill will help halt destruction of the Brazilian Amazon and other biomes. Credit: Shutterstock

This joint briefingEndorsing the end of the Amazon: Critical weaknesses in the UK Government's proposed forest risk commodities framework and how to fix them, prepared with the input of Brazilian organisations and supported by 21 civil society organisations and academics, including Earthsight, outlines the legal reforms proposed in Brazil and provides detailed arguments as to why and how Schedule 17 should be strengthened.

In particular, it focuses on the need to cover all deforestation (not just deforestation that is treated as 'illegal' in producer jurisdictions), the need to protect the rights of forest defenders and Indigenous Peoples, and the need to include cattle and soy, as well as other non-agricultural commodities associated with deforestation, as "forest risk commodities". 

We urge members of the House of Lords to raise these concerns about Schedule 17 during the debate on Wednesday 15 September, and note that Amendment 106, tabled by Lord Randall of Uxbridge, would help fix some of the existing gaps. We strongly encourage Peers to attend the debate and support this amendment.

More from Analysis

Ukraine / EU recognises neither FSC nor government can guarantee wood is legal  

Continue reading
Нова настанова щодо імпорту деревини з України стверджує, що ні офіційні документи на рубку, ні сертифікати FSC не гарантують відповідності законодавству ЄС щодо...

Continue reading
UK Environment Bill / Short-sighted proposal will leave Brazil deforesters unchecked

Continue reading
Supply chain laws / A defining six months ahead to curb tropical deforestation crisis 

Continue reading
The Last Refuge / Defending the ancestral forests of the Ayoreo Totobiegosode

Continue reading
Paraguay's Looted Lands / How war, trade and dictatorship created the world’s worst deforestation crisis

Continue reading
Flatpacked Forests / Ikea’s response to its illegal timber scandal is a sham

Continue reading
Paraguay fires / Blazes detected in Paraguay farms linked to BMW and JLR leather supply

Continue reading
Due diligence / Eight reasons proposed UK law won’t stop consumption driving global deforestation 

Continue reading
The Carbon Lottery /  Europe blind to potentially huge Brazilian beef carbon footprints

Continue reading

Stay up to date with all Earthsight news & updates

Receive email updates for the latest news and insights from Earthsight and be among the first to read our new investigations.

We keep your data secure and don’t share anything with third parties. Read full terms.