Bolloré loses defamation appeal against media company that exposed SOCFIN’s rights violations in Cameroon

22.04.2019

French documentary revealed poor working conditions and child labour at Socapalm, a Socfin palm oil subsidiary in Cameroon

A rubber plantation of the Salala Rubber Corporation in Liberia. Photo: Bread for All

On 27 March the Bolloré Group lost on appeal its defamation case against France Télévisions. Bolloré had sued the media company after it aired a documentary in 2016 about Vincent Bolloré, one of the group’s main shareholders and one of France’s richest and best known businessmen.

Bolloré and Belgian businessman Hubert Fabri control Socfin, a major palm oil, natural rubber and seed producer headquartered in Luxembourg. Socfin holds thousands of hectares of plantations in Africa and Asia.

The documentary revealed poor working conditions and child labour at Socapalm, a Socfin palm oil subsidiary in Cameroon. Journalists had raised concerns that the lawsuit had the aim of silencing criticism of corporate behaviour.

The Paris court ordered Bolloré to pay €10,000 in damages to the television company for initiating abusive proceedings.

In February . Socfin has stated that it respects human rights and these countries’ laws and that it “has a zero tolerance to using force or corrupt means to influence people’s right to express themselves.”

In Cameroon, Socfin's subsidiaries Socapalm and Safacam have been. Socfin has denied any wrongdoing and called these accusations unjust and false.

In September 2018, the forest and rights NGO Socfin said it has no authority to prevent villagers from pressing their own palm oil or accessing their crops, and that the land has been legally leased to the company by the state.

Socfin has made numerous commitments to greater transparency, respect for human rights and responsible management across its plantations. Following the court decision, Fern stated that “the case underscores, again, the limits of voluntary social and environmental commitments” made by large corporations.

The organisation emphasised that “an EU action plan addressing deforestation and community rights is needed, including a regulation mandating company due diligence on human rights and environmental harm”.

More from Blog

Yet more evidence has emerged demonstrating the failure of the world’s largest beef companies to cut their ties to forest destruction. This time the accusations are coming not from journalists or activists, but from an important investor

Continue reading
Grand Theft Chaco II / Paraguay Senate seeks accountability from government following Earthsight illegal deforestation exposé

Continue reading
EU anti-deforestation law / Suspect timber firms lobby for certified wood ‘green lane’ in draft proposal

Continue reading
Open letter / Paraguay must halt invasions, deforestation of indigenous Ayoreo lands

Continue reading
FSC hall of shame / The ethical wood label’s long line of scandals

Continue reading
Open letter / Ethical wood label FSC is no longer fit for purpose and must urgently reform

Continue reading
UK Environment Bill / Government proposals to end UK role in driving deforestation overseas must be beefed up for benefits to be realised

Continue reading
Ikea's House of Horrors / Ikea, FSC actions on Siberia illegal logging scandal are a start. In our climate crisis, they must do much more

Continue reading
Grand Theft Chaco / An Illustrated guide to Europe’s role in Paraguay forest destruction

Continue reading
EUTR / Swedish court fines company for Ukrainian timber purchases that flouted EU law, following Earthsight investigation

Continue reading

Stay up to date with all Earthsight news & updates

Receive email updates for the latest news and insights from Earthsight and be among the first to read our new investigations.

We keep your data secure and don’t share anything with third parties. Read full terms.