Indonesian coalition pushes for transparency over decision to drop forest fire cases

06.10.2016

An alliance of Indonesian human rights NGOs is taking the provincial police in Riau, Sumatra, to the Central Information Commission over its refusal to disclose the legal basis for dropping cases against 15 plantation companies accused of starting illegal forest fires.

The companies had been identified by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry as potentially complicit in the fires that became a global crisis in 2015. The forest and peatland fires generated huge volumes of greenhouse gases and were estimated to have contributed to more than 100,000 premature deaths.

In July, however, the local police in Riau province issued SP3 notices, an official document announcing that a case is closed, for the 15 companies.

The Commission for Disappearances and Victims of Violence (Kontras) has argued that it is entitled to view the documents outlining the legal basis for the decision to terminate the cases, under Indonesia’s freedom of information law, the Public Information Disclosure Act (PIDA).

On Monday Kontras told media that two formal attempts to determine the reasoning behind the decision had been ignored by the Riau police. The formal process under the PIDA may force the police to release documents, but even if successful will be a lengthy process.

Luhut Pandjaitan, a retired general and senior member of the Indonesian cabinet, had been appointed by President Joko Widodo to coordinate a cross-ministerial response to the fires. After the SP3 notices were issued he expressed concern over the decision and said he would seek an explanation. The following day he was moved from his position in a cabinet reshuffle.

In September the National Police Chief, General Tito Karnavian, told the media that only the National Police had the right to issue SP3s to corporations (see video below), implying the decision was not taken at the provincial level. He attributed the decision to a lack of evidence, indications that the fires had started outside the companies’ concession boundaries and spread in, and that they had occurred in community lands.

Obtaining the SP3 would enable the NGOs to verify the evidence that forms the basis of this position.

More from Illegal Deforestation Monitor

Covid-19 / Pandemic compounds local ire against palm oil firms in West Africa

Continue reading
ISPO / Indonesia's recent “reform” of palm oil sustainability scheme criticised for threatening forests and human rights

Continue reading
UK military / Brazil beef supplier used by Ministry of Defence buys from farmers guilty of illegal deforestation, fires and fraud

Continue reading
Cameroon / Local women fight back against controversial palm oil, rubber firms accused of destroying community way of life 

Continue reading
Mexico / Decline of monarch butterflies shows need for greater forest protections

Continue reading
Cocoa / New report emphasises threats major firms face in not having a full picture of their supply chains

Continue reading
Colniza massacre / Repórter Brasil investigation reveals links between JBS and Marfrig and  farmer accused of brutal 2017 killings

Continue reading
Tanah Merah / Auditor kayu Indonesia akan menyelidiki tuduhan izin-izin palsu bagi kayu senilai $6Milyar



Continue reading
Norges Bank / Norwegian sovereign wealth fund divests from consumer giant Alicorp over palm oil-linked destruction in Peru

Continue reading
JBS / Brazil meatpacking giant urged to improve monitoring as  politicians and NGOs pile on pressure 

Continue reading

Stay up to date with all Earthsight news & updates

Receive email updates for the latest news and insights from Earthsight and be among the first to read our new investigations.

We keep your data secure and don’t share anything with third parties. Read full terms.