Indonesian government finances palm oil companies ignoring its laws


Image showing fire hotspots recorded on land owned by the Korindo company PT Papua Agro Lestari in December 2015

Banks owned by the Indonesian government are funding illegal activities by large-scale palm oil companies that are undermining high-profile policy commitments made by the country’s President to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Three banks majority-owned by the state – Bank Mandiri, Bank Rakyat Indonesia and Bank Negara Indonesia – have ploughed billions of dollars into an industry that is systematically undermining the rule of law and efforts to repair Indonesia’s reputation as a climate villain in the wake of catastrophic forest fires.

The companies financed by the three banks are clearing and draining peatlands and stand accused of failing to avoid fires in areas under their management. Some are even alleged to have deliberately started fires to clear land. All of these acts are, to varying degrees, illegal or criminal in Indonesia.

The evidence has been laid bare in a new report by Aidenvironment, commissioned by the NGO Rainforest Foundation Norway. It provides detailed allegations against seven palm oil companies operating across the islands of Sumatra, Kalimantan, Sulawesi and Papua.

The Korean-owned conglomerate Korindo, the largest palm oil company in Papua, is alleged to have intentionally used fire in the course of clearing for its plantations. It has destroyed 30,000 hectares of tropical forest for palm oil since 2013.

“All evidence – satellite imagery, hotspot data, and aerial photographs – pointed to systematic and abundant use of fire during Korindo’s land clearing processes,” the report states. “This is illegal in Indonesia. During the 2013–2015 period, all Korindo’s land clearing to establish oil palm plantations was accompanied by burning.”

Korindo has been financed by the state-owned Bank Negara Indonesia.

Sampoerna Agro, which is embroiled in land rights conflicts, is currently being prosecuted by the Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry for failing to mitigate fires in its concessions. The Ministry alleges that Sampoerna made “no effort” to prevent fires spreading inside and outside its concession in 2014, according to the report.

In August 2016, a court ordered Sampoerna to pay approximately US$80 million for compensation and ecosystem restoration. Sampoerna has appealed the verdict. It also has outstanding loans amounting to more than two trillion Rupiah from the three Indonesian state banks.

While development on peatlands more than three meters deep has been prohibited in Indonesia for several years, the government has taken several measures to prohibit all expansion into peatland since Indonesia’s peatlands were the site of massive fires in 2015.

Peatlands, which function like a wet sponge in their normal conditions, become highly combustible when drained for plantation development. As in 2015, the fires are almost impossible to control when they begin and generate vast greenhouse gas emissions.

The evidence suggests that almost all of the companies financed by state banks are in violation of the measures taken to prevent further exploitation of peatlands, including planting on burned land.

An analysis by the NGOs Rainforest Action Network and TUK in 2016 found that, according to their public policies, the three state owned banks had no measures in place to avoid financing of such illegal activities.

None of the banks required proof of legality in the operations of their clients, or checked the legality of their land tenure. According to their policies, they do not commission independent assessments of legal compliance.

The Aidenvironment report principally highlights the role of Norwegian financial institutions as investors in the Indonesian banks. Over recent years the Norwegian state pension fund has led the sector in divesting from environmentally harmful activities, including many palm oil firms. However, it may still be benefiting from illegal deforestation through their investments in the Indonesian government-owned banks.

More from Blog

Sanctions breached / Evidence of laundered Russian plywood found by EU investigation

Continue reading
Russian Sanctions / US sanctions should cover blood timber

Continue reading
Paraguayan leather / Are Italian tannery’s pledges on deforestation enough?

Continue reading
EU Deforestation Regulation / Success of landmark deforestation law far from assured 

Continue reading
EU Law / MEPs must strengthen planned corporate sustainability due diligence law

Continue reading
G7 Sanctions / Cash from "conflict timber" still flowing into Russia and Belarus

Continue reading
Interview / Earthsight spoke to Andrei Sannikov about the urgent need for strong sanctions on Russian and Belarusian timber

Continue reading
Indigenous rights / “We are in mourning, but we carry on with our struggle”

Continue reading
EU Policy / EU agrees on much needed landmark law, but work still needed to fully protect forests and communities

Continue reading
FSC / Crucial reforms blocked by industry actors

Continue reading

Stay up to date with all Earthsight news & updates

Receive email updates for the latest news and insights from Earthsight and be among the first to read our new investigations.

We keep your data secure and don’t share anything with third parties. Read full terms.