International investment driving land grabbing, human rights violations and environmental destruction in Brazilian Cerrado


A recent report by FIAN International and the Brazilian organisations Comissão Pastoral da Terra and Rede Social de Justiça e Direitos Humanos has drawn attention to the relationship between global finance, land grabbing and agribusiness expansion in one of Brazil’s most threatened biomes, the Cerrado. 

This post is based extensively on the report The Human and Environmental Cost of Land Business – The Case of MATOPIBA, Brazil.

The Cerrado is one of the world’s most biodiverse tropical savannas. It covers more than a fifth of Brazil’s territory and is home to numerous traditional and peasant communities. It is also one of Brazil’s newest agricultural frontiers. The biome has been the focus of concerns as it has already lost more than half of its native vegetation and is subject to weaker protections than the Amazon.

Conservationists have debated whether land scarcity in older agricultural frontiers and commitments made by agribusinesses to protect the Amazon have led to a boom in agricultural activity in the Cerrado. Over the last decade, 37 percent of soy expansion in Brazil took place at the expense of the biome’s native ecosystem.

Much of this increased activity has been connected to illegalities. Last May, major commodity traders were fined $29 million by the Brazilian authorities for buying grain from illegally deforested areas in the Matopiba region of the Cerrado – comprising Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia states.

The report by FIAN and its Brazilian counterparts has shed light on the connections between land grabbing, international capital, and agribusiness expansion in the Cerrado, and its consequences for the people and the environment of the region.

Rising land prices in the Matopiba region has attracted transnational land companies and land grabbers, generating a business that transferred more than 19,000 square kilometres of land in the region between 2013 and 2015. According to the report’s authors, land is often appropriated “through an illegal act of forging ownership and enclosing/fencing off, driving out local people” to create new farms for agroindustrial production, including through deforestation. These farms are then sold to agribusinesses or real estate companies by three times the amount it cost to prepare them.

In many cases, lands illegally appropriated are then used to “illegally expand the property through […] violence, and forgery of documents”. The report highlights how “those that are operating on the ground are backed by international financial actors and transnational companies that channel huge amounts of capital into the land business”.

The report’s authors describe the forced and often violent displacement of peasant communities. They claim that authorities at the state and federal levels have systematically failed to protect communities and individuals, monitor business dealings, ensure the proper titling of communal lands and commercial properties, punish the perpetrators of crimes and violations, and enforce environmental laws.

These findings are supported by a recent series on the Cerrado by Mongabay. The articles illustrated how agribusiness expansion in the biome has been associated with land theft and conflicts with local communities. The Matopiba region saw a 56 percent increase in reported land conflicts due to land grabbing in the 2012-2016 period. Mongabay has also highlighted the plight of traditional community peasants forced to migrate to urban slums in Tocantins after being deprived of their livelihoods by large-scale soy production.

More from Blog

Sanctions breached / Evidence of laundered Russian plywood found by EU investigation

Continue reading
Russian Sanctions / US sanctions should cover blood timber

Continue reading
Paraguayan leather / Are Italian tannery’s pledges on deforestation enough?

Continue reading
EU Deforestation Regulation / Success of landmark deforestation law far from assured 

Continue reading
EU Law / MEPs must strengthen planned corporate sustainability due diligence law

Continue reading
G7 Sanctions / Cash from "conflict timber" still flowing into Russia and Belarus

Continue reading
Interview / Earthsight spoke to Andrei Sannikov about the urgent need for strong sanctions on Russian and Belarusian timber

Continue reading
Indigenous rights / “We are in mourning, but we carry on with our struggle”

Continue reading
EU Policy / EU agrees on much needed landmark law, but work still needed to fully protect forests and communities

Continue reading
FSC / Crucial reforms blocked by industry actors

Continue reading

Stay up to date with all Earthsight news & updates

Receive email updates for the latest news and insights from Earthsight and be among the first to read our new investigations.

We keep your data secure and don’t share anything with third parties. Read full terms.