Latest
Why leather must remain in the EUDR
14.10.2025 Debunked industry-promoted myths on deforestation highlight why leather hides need to be covered by the EU Deforestation Regulation
Submission on the EU Commission’s proposed rollback of environmental laws
11.09.2025 Our input into the consultation on a proposed environmental omnibus law
Amendments to EUDR could harm EU efforts to block Russian and Belarusian ‘conflict timber’
14.07.2025 Changes could incentivise laundering of wood into the EU
Why introducing a ‘no-risk’ category into the EU Deforestation Regulation is a bad idea
19.06.2025 The proposed exemption could create a loophole
EU Commission, Parliament respond to ‘blood birch’ scandal – now the Council must act
16.05.2025 Wood sanctions must be expanded to tackle the oligarch-linked trade
Getting EUDR enforcement right
08.05.2025 Authorities should focus on depth not breadth: the first in our series on enforcement of the EU deforestation law
The EU’s Omnibus amendments put corporate accountability into reverse
02.05.2025 Proposals could let major retailers off the hook for abuses
How sustainable is sustainable soy?
27.11.2024 RTRS’s weak standard is facilitating the greenwashing of deforesters and land grabbers in the Cerrado
Academic study confirms green labels fall short of requirements set by upcoming EU deforestation law
15.08.2024 Green labels do not fully align with the most important requirements of the EUDR relating to deforestation and legality
Fresh evidence of illegal deforestation in European beef and leather imports underscores importance of EU law
18.07.2024 European consumers have been buying beef and leather from firms linked to illegalities in the Brazilian Amazon
