- A new analysis shows that $10–$30 billion in fraudulent wood products certified by green label for wood Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) may be sold each year globally – a scale far greater than previously understood
- The analysis pulls together FSC’s own investigations to show that, unbeknownst to consumers, the fraud has affected a vast array of products, from toilet roll and furniture to plywood, charcoal, and pellets
- Almost all major cases have been caught not by the green label’s own systems, but by NGOs, journalists and whistleblowers
- A motion tabled at a global FSC gathering in Panama next week is the last opportunity to introduce mandatory volume-based traceability – a basic requirement to protect FSC’s future and align it with EU legislation
- Previous efforts to stamp out fraud have been vetoed by FSC’s wood company members. Earthsight is calling on the remaining NGO members to stage a walk out if the same thing happens again
Logs stamped with the FSC seal
The blog, titled Will FSC act on the billion-dollar fraud at its heart?, is available here.
The credibility of Bonn-based Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) – the world’s largest green label for wood products – is facing its gravest threat yet. A new analysis released today by London-based environmental investigation non-profit Earthsight reveals that up to $30 billion in fraudulent FSC-certified goods may be entering global markets each year. At next week’s General Assembly in Panama, FSC members will vote on the need for a key traceability requirement – a watershed moment that will determine whether the organisation finally takes serious action to tackle the fraud crisis at its heart or drifts into irrelevance.
“This is the last call to save FSC,” warned one of the world’s leading FSC auditing firms.
Fraud has been uncovered in every major region and product category, involving some of the biggest players in global forestry and retail: from China’s largest plywood exporter to a top-five global pellet producer, with fraudulent goods ending up on shelves at IKEA, Aldi, Lidl and other retail giants.
But these are just the cases FSC has shared information about and almost all of them have been exposed by outsiders including Earthsight, not FSC’s own systems. Given how little of FSC trade these cases represent, the real figure is almost certainly far higher than the already shocking totals uncovered.
These issues are not new. In 2021, more than 30 civil society organisations signed an open letter warning FSC leadership about deep systemic failures, including weak oversight, corporate capture, and a lack of accountability. Those warnings went unheeded – and the fraud crisis has only worsened since.
Even when fraud at the wood watchdog is proven, the analysis shows that enforcement is weak. Blacklisted companies routinely re-enter the system within months. Penalties are minimal and easily circumvented. Meanwhile, there is a growing mismatch between supply and claimed volumes. Certified forest area is down 30 per cent since 2022 after the withdrawal of Russian and Belarusian forests from FSC following the Ukraine war but the number of companies licensed to trade FSC-certified wood is up 37 per cent – fuelling a perfect storm for widespread abuse.
Technologies trumpeted by FSC as solutions – such as scientific testing or blockchain – offer only token improvements, Earthsight’s analysis shows. Without a robust system to track volumes across the supply chain, they are functionally meaningless.
Meanwhile, governments are already outpacing FSC. The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) – which is set to come into force at the end of 2025 for large companies – requires full traceability and geolocation of timber sources. If FSC fails to pass the traceability requirement (tabled as Motion 30), its system will fall behind EU law, making its label effectively obsolete in one of the world’s largest wood product markets.
Motion 30 offers a clear, practical fix – mandatory volume-based traceability, closing the loopholes that have allowed billions in fraudulent products to flood the market. For it to work, implementation must be accelerated and industry members must not be allowed to veto reform, as they have before. The world’s forests cannot afford another decade of FSC inaction. FSC faces multiple systemic problems. But if it cannot even take this most basic step to address rampant fraud, its credibility is beyond repair.
“Whenever anyone goes looking for FSC fraud, they nearly always find it,” said Sam Lawson, Director of Earthsight. “This is a billion-dollar scandal hiding in plain sight. If Motion 30 fails, FSC will have proven itself unfit for purpose, and the world’s leading environmental organisations must stop lending it credibility, and walk away.”
Please contact Sam Lawson, Director of Earthsight for further comment: samlawson@earthsight.org.uk
ENDS
Notes The Forest Stewardship Council [FSC] is the most recognisable ethical label for wood and wood products. It certifies forests at their source as well as products made with wood like books, clothing sold in high-street retail chains, furniture or packaging sold by well-known firms. A 2022 survey conducted by FSC showed 46 per cent of consumers worldwide recognise the FSC logo. Eighty per cent of them “are more likely to trust a brand if it offered FSC-certified products.” FSC’s statistics show that 72 per cent of consumers in the UK, 71 per cent in Germany and 67 per cent in Denmark recognise the FSC logo.
Phil Guillery, FSC’s former Integrity Director, has said he believes 20-30 per cent of FSC claims are false. Total global FSC-certified product sales were estimated at $20 billion in 2007. Based on the growth in FSC certified forest area and adjusting for inflation, Earthsight estimates that that figure is likely $100 billion today. Given the levels of fraud and statements by former FSC employees like Phil Guillery, Earthsight estimates that $10–$30 billion of fraudulent FSC-certified goods are sold on the market each year.
Peter Feilberg, Executive Director for Preferred by Nature, a body offering FSC certification services and an FSC member, said in October 2025 that the upcoming General Assembly in Panama was the “last chance to save the FSC”.
Earthsight’s analysis of FSC-certified forests and companies is based on official information made available by FSC as of 12 October 2025. The FSC Connect database containing this information is available here.
A 2021 open letter signed by Greenpeace, the Environmental Investigation Agency, Rainforest Action Network, Fern, Earthsight and others called for FSC to be reformed, ahead of the previous FSC General Assembly which took place in Bali, Indonesia, in 2022.
In January 2025, Earthsight published a detailed report based on undercover work, revealing firms offering to put FSC labels on sanctioned Russian plywood for illegal import into the EU.
FSC holds its 10th General Assembly in Panama from 26 to 31 October 2025. Motion 30, requiring volume tracking and traceability to be implemented by FSC, will be tabled for vote during the meeting.
