Parliament resolves to tackle EU’s role in driving illegal deforestation through imports of agro-commodities


On 4 April, the EU Parliament passed a ‘Resolution’ calling for action by the world’s largest economic bloc to urgently address tropical deforestation, including regulations to address the EU’s role in driving the destruction through its imports of agricultural commodities grown on illegally deforested land.

The EU Parliament report repeatedly cited a 2014 study for Forest Trends written by Earthsight’s Director, Sam Lawson, which showed that nearly half of all recent tropical deforestation is the result of illegal clearing for commercial agriculture and that this destruction is driven by overseas demand for agricultural commodities, including palm oil, beef, soy, and wood products. 

The legislators described themselves as being ‘alarmed’ by the associated findings by forests and rights NGO Fern, which estimated that a quarter of all illegal deforestation commodities were destined for the EU.

The resolution received near-unanimous support from the Parliament’s Environment Committee, which includes representatives from across the political spectrum and all EU member states. 

Though the Resolution was focused mainly on palm oil, it recognised the need for action by the EU in relation to other agricultural commodity imports linked to deforestation, such as soy and beef.

The Resolution calls on the European Commission to urgently develop an EU Action Plan on Deforestation which would “include concrete regulatory measures to ensure that no supply chains and financial transactions linked to the EU result in deforestation and forest degradation”.

The Parliament specifically called on the EU to enact new laws regarding forest-risk agricultural commodity imports along the lines of those already passed on timber. 

The 2010 EU Timber Regulation banned the import of illegally-sourced wood and required importers to carry out due diligence on wood purchases. Associated laws allow for the EU to implement bilateral agreements with source countries which seek to ensure that only legal wood can be traded. 

As well as blocking illegal wood, these agreements have led to wider improvements in governance and transparency in source countries.

Fern Campaign Co-ordinator Saskia Ozinga welcomed the Parliament’s vote but stressed the need for urgent follow-up. 

“This Resolution sends a strong message that one of the world’s largest markets for agricultural commodities will no longer tolerate its imports contributing to tropical deforestation. But on its own it won’t do anything. It is essential that the EU turn this statement of intent into meaningful action,” she said.

More from Blog

Sanctions breached / Evidence of laundered Russian plywood found by EU investigation

Continue reading
Russian Sanctions / US sanctions should cover blood timber

Continue reading
Paraguayan leather / Are Italian tannery’s pledges on deforestation enough?

Continue reading
EU Deforestation Regulation / Success of landmark deforestation law far from assured 

Continue reading
EU Law / MEPs must strengthen planned corporate sustainability due diligence law

Continue reading
G7 Sanctions / Cash from "conflict timber" still flowing into Russia and Belarus

Continue reading
Interview / Earthsight spoke to Andrei Sannikov about the urgent need for strong sanctions on Russian and Belarusian timber

Continue reading
Indigenous rights / “We are in mourning, but we carry on with our struggle”

Continue reading
EU Policy / EU agrees on much needed landmark law, but work still needed to fully protect forests and communities

Continue reading
FSC / Crucial reforms blocked by industry actors

Continue reading

Stay up to date with all Earthsight news & updates

Receive email updates for the latest news and insights from Earthsight and be among the first to read our new investigations.

We keep your data secure and don’t share anything with third parties. Read full terms.